Sitrep for Oct. 19-22, 2026 (as of 10 a.m. UTC+3)
Frontline Situation Update
In the Lyman direction, where the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been conducting Operation Vivaldi to clear the Shandryholove salient, fighting continues around the Zherebets River. There have been no new advances in this sector so far, but we expect the AFU to try to secure more advantageous positions by establishing a foothold along a line running through the villages of Makiivka, Balka Zhuravka (known as Nevske until September 2024), Terny, Yampolivka, and Zarichne. These positions are important because they are separated from the next line of villages—Chervonopopivka, Ploshchanka, and Zhytlivka—as well as the town of Kreminna, by open fields with scattered tree lines. By taking these positions, the AFU would be able to push Russian forces back beyond the fields, since holding open terrain would be virtually impossible and launching counterattacks there would be difficult. If the AFU can also clear the area around the village of Yampil, the town of Lyman could be used as a logistics hub to supply units operating along the Zherebets River.
French researcher Clément Molin has published a map showing his assessment of the frontline in the Lyman direction. We largely agree with his assessment, rather than with DeepState's maps, which are updated with significant delays. In particular, Molin believes that Ukrainian-controlled territory extends almost to the Zherebets River, beyond which lies a contested zone. However, we cannot yet agree with his assessment of Ukrainian gains around the town of Mykolaivka, east of Sloviansk. According to Molin, the AFU cleared the area east of Lyman, advanced south, crossed the Siverskyi Donets River, reached Mykolaivka, and took full control of the area to the east and southeast of the town. We have not yet seen any confirmation of these Ukrainian advances and believe these areas should instead be considered part of the contested zone.
In the Dobropillia direction in Donetsk region, Ukrainian troops filmed an area north of the town of Rodynske using a drone. This town has been in the Russian rear at least since August. Routes used by Russian assault troops to infiltrate toward the village of Vodianske and the town of Dobropillia run through this area. Contrary to Russian claims, Dobropillia has still not been captured.
A "road of death" has emerged where these routes cross the railway. At least 41 bodies of Russian soldiers have been found along this 100-meter stretch. Ukrainian UAVs continuously track Russian assault troops in the area, while Russian commanders continue sending them there despite the losses.
The frontline is just over 5 km from Rodynske. This proximity makes it impossible to safely recover the bodies of those killed or even biological material for subsequent identification. These kill zones vividly illustrate why reports of assault troops killed in action are now being added to the name-by-name list of Russian military fatalities compiled by Mediazona, an independent Russian media outlet, and BBC News Russian with a substantial delay. According to Mediazona's assessment, we will probably not learn the true scale of Russian military fatalities in 2026 until 2028.
Statements by the General Staff of the RuAF and the Russian MoD contradict each other in the Stepnohirsk direction (the western sector of the Zaporizhzhia axis). General Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the RuAF, had previously asserted that Russian positions were just 5 km from the city of Zaporizhzhia, although the frontline in fact runs near the village of Stepnohirsk. Then, on Oct. 21, the MoD claimed the capture of the village of Yulivka, roughly 20 km from Zaporizhzhia, north of the Konka River and northeast of the village of Malokaterynivka, which lies at the edge of the contested zone. To actually capture Yulivka and Malokaterynivka, where Russian forces have not yet established a foothold, and advance farther toward Zaporizhzhia, the RuAF would need to cross the Konka River. Additionally, the RuAF can advance along the shore of the former Kakhovka Reservoir, across the exposed, overgrown parts of the Dnipro riverbed. Small assault groups use this route. Ukrainian forces, in turn, attempt to eliminate these assault groups. The Brotherhood battalion, part of Timur’s Special Unit within the Main Directorate of Intelligence of Ukraine's Ministry of Defense, published a video of such an operation. The footage shows how dense, tall vegetation allows Ukrainian troops to hide from enemy drones or even approach Russian assault troops unnoticed.
Ukrainian troops showed footage of a heavy hexacopter evacuating a wounded soldier from the 30th Separate Mechanized Brigade. He sustained severe injuries to his legs, and the conditions made evacuation by a ground robot impossible. His fellow soldiers worked with the manufacturer to modify the heavy bomber drone so that it could evacuate an adult man. The soldier lost both feet but survived.
We previously reported on the DARPA Robotics Challenge, in which participants developed UAVs capable of lifting loads heavier than their own weight. As these technologies develop, evacuating or moving large loads will probably no longer require UAVs this large. This kind of aerial evacuation is especially important when wounded soldiers need to be transported to medical personnel as quickly as possible.
Recently, we reported on the dire humanitarian situation in occupied Oleshky on the left bank of the Dnipro River in the Kherson region. According to reports, Russian forces were restricting entry to and exit from the city, while local residents were experiencing acute shortages of water and food. A similar situation has developed in the town of Hola Prystan and other coastal settlements.
Ukrainian authorities have proposed that the Russian side organize an evacuation of residents to territory controlled by Ukraine. It is important to emphasize that the responsibility to ensure the safety of the civilian population and meet its basic needs rests with Russia as the occupying power: Russian authorities should have either ensured the supply of essential goods to these settlements or long ago evacuated the residents to safe areas.
Recently, Dmytro Lubinets, the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights, reported that Ukraine and Russia were finalizing the details of the evacuation of civilians from Oleshky and six other settlements in the Oleshky community. According to available information, around 6,000 people may remain there, including up to 200 children. Even if all the details are finalized, the evacuation could take weeks or months: people will likely be transported out in groups, starting with children, the elderly, the sick, and other particularly vulnerable categories of citizens. We can only hope that the agreements will be implemented and that residents will finally be able to reach safety.
On Oct. 20, a strike hit a building in Donetsk that also houses the telecom operator Ugletelecom. The following day, Ukrainian forces struck the former Ukrtelecom building in Luhansk, which now houses the telecom operator Lugakom. A fire broke out in the building, but the extent of damage to the equipment is unknown. We believe both strikes may be responses to Russian attacks on telecommunications infrastructure.
Attacks on bridges are continuing as well. On Oct. 19, Russian forces struck the Southern Bridge in Dnipro with two or three munitions. Some sources claim that glide bombs were used. The bridge is more than 135 km from the nearest point on the frontline. Since aircraft release glide bombs before reaching Ukrainian positions, the munition would have needed a range of approximately 160-170 km. Public sources have not reported that Russia possesses glide bombs capable of covering such a distance. If the Southern Bridge was indeed hit by an air-dropped bomb, it may have been a version equipped with a jet engine, effectively turning it into a missile. Another possibility is the use of a cruise missile, such as the Banderol. Ukrainian sources sometimes refer to any powerful munitions whose type cannot be immediately identified as KABs (guided air-dropped bombs).
Previously, Russian forces attempted to attack bridges in Kyiv and Zaporizhzhia using drones. Now a bridge in Dnipro has come under attack as well. So far, however, these attacks have not caused any serious disruption to Ukrainian logistics.
Meanwhile, following the recent drone raid on Saint Petersburg, satellite images were published that reportedly show damage to two bridges, rather than just one. We cannot be entirely certain that the damage to the second bridge, the Finlyandsky Railway Bridge, was caused by this particular raid. Nevertheless, we are inclined to believe that the strike on the bridge over the Korabelny Fairway was not accidental.
Thus, the spiral of aerial escalation continues to accelerate.
For the second consecutive week, Russian UAVs have reached western regions of Ukraine, including Volyn, Rivne, and Ternopil regions. Meanwhile, according to the latest sitreps from the Ukrainian Air Force, only about two-thirds of the drones launched are being intercepted. As a result, many UAVs are reaching their targets and can inflict significant damage, particularly on energy infrastructure.
One possible reason is the ongoing speed restrictions imposed on the Starshield military satellite communications system. According to Volodymyr Zelenskyy, terminals stop operating reliably at speeds of approximately 130-161 km/h, hampering the use of various types of Ukrainian drones, particularly jet-powered interceptor UAVs. These UAVs need to reach speeds of 400-500 km/h, but at such speeds they cannot maintain a stable control link through conventional mobile networks. Without Starshield, they therefore effectively lose the ability to intercept jet-powered Geran drones.
The restrictions have also affected communications with combat helicopters used to shoot down standard, propeller-driven Shahed drones. According to Ukrainian presidential adviser on technology and military expert Serhii "Flash" Beskrestnov, the helicopters fly faster than 160 km/h, so Starshield can no longer provide a crucial data link. Presumably, crews used this link to receive up-to-date information on the air threat picture, target routes, and anticipated interception areas through the Virazh-Planshet automated command-and-control system.
The situation regarding warnings from US partners about Russian ballistic missile launches also remains unclear. According to Ukrainian officials, the United States continues to provide such information but does not report every threat. For example, a warning may be absent for the first wave of an attack but arrive for subsequent waves. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio attributed the failure to provide Ukraine with early warnings of ballistic missile attacks to a software problem.
While technical failures cannot be ruled out, there is growing suspicion that the Trump administration is deliberately sharing only part of the intelligence, allowing it to continue denying that restrictions have been imposed and to attribute individual gaps to weather, errors, or software issues. US authorities have not formally acknowledged a shift from threats to concrete pressure measures, yet they make decisions or delay procedures seemingly intended to prevent Ukraine from receiving the weapons or communications capabilities it needs. It remains impossible to determine conclusively who initiated the speed restrictions on satellite communications. According to The Wall Street Journal, Elon Musk and Trump discussed the decision both before and after it became public knowledge. Some sources say Musk acted independently, while others say he consulted Trump and other senior administration officials beforehand.
In the early hours of Oct. 19, Russia launched 16 ballistic missiles at Ukraine. Meanwhile, it has been reported that the US is currently providing Ukraine with 12 interceptor missiles for Patriot air defense systems per month, totaling 144 per year. This is far from sufficient to counter Russian strikes, as intercepting 16 ballistic missiles would require approximately 32 interceptor missiles.
In addition, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has not signed the documents required for the delivery of Patriot and AIM-9X missiles already paid for by NATO countries. AIM-9X missiles are also used by NASAMS surface-to-air missile systems. There has been no formal refusal; the documents have simply remained unsigned, delaying the deliveries.
Ukraine currently receives missiles for its air defenses through two main channels. The first is the PURL mechanism, while the second involves transfers of missiles from the stockpiles of other countries friendly to Ukraine, with such transfers requiring US authorization for re-export. According to The Washington Post, at least some of the delayed deliveries fall into the second category: Hegseth has neither formally rejected nor approved these transfers.
Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries may be one political motive behind the Trump administration's pressure on Ukraine. According to The Atlantic, citing three people close to President Donald Trump, he believes Ukraine is attacking Russian oil-refining facilities in part to undermine the Republican Party’s prospects in the Nov. 3 midterm congressional elections. If Republicans lose, Trump may blame Zelenskyy and intensify pressure on Ukraine after the elections. However, the newly elected Congress will not take office until January, meaning the current Congress, in which Republicans hold a stronger position, will remain in place through the end of the year. This issue was discussed in greater detail during a livestream featuring Evgeny Feldman and Ruslan Leviev.
The Kremlin appears to be playing into Trump's pre-election rhetoric, seeking to portray his efforts as supposedly bringing the parties back to the negotiating table. Putin’s aide Yury Ushakov said Russia is "in general" ready to resume trilateral talks with the United States and Ukraine in November. This marks a shift from earlier statements by Russian officials that there was little to discuss beyond the final terms of ending the war.
At the same time, Putin announced during his meeting with Steve Witkoff the release of American Steven Hubbard, whom Russian forces took hostage in Izium in April 2022 and charged with fighting on the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Witkoff thanked Putin for Hubbard's release and praised him as a "humanitarian."
Trump again shared his version of how the full-scale war began. In his telling, Russia could have taken Ukraine in a single day if not for a "stupid general" who allegedly ordered tanks off the highway, causing them to get stuck in the mud. Trump has told this story before, making nearly the same claim in May 2025. This interpretation is so close to Russian pro-war propaganda that it is sometimes hard to tell whether such words belong to the US president or a pro-war blogger, as they tend to attribute their failures to chance rather than acknowledge their own mistakes. In reality, the blitzkrieg failed due to a series of strategic mistakes by the Russian military command and a well-organized Ukrainian defense.
We need your support to continue our efforts. Please consider making a monthly donation to CIT through our fundraising page or Patreon.